As a anti-White, Vance and Chua are *happy* to support 'HBD' because HBD glorifies jews and asians while maintaining the 'Whites are lazy' narrative that serves the interests of the capitalist ruling class.
In the long run, there is no effective separation of race issues from class issues. It's really a question of *which* race you are going to support and *which* class you are doing to defend.
Thiel is an anti-White capitalist. So is Vance. So is Trump.
In the end, they all side with non-Whites (Indians, Chinese) against Whites *because this is the value system of the ruling class in the West*.
They all agree that the White working class in the middle parts of the country need to be stomped into submission and encouraged to kill themselves in deaths of despair.
The 'liberals' just do anti-White different from the 'conservatives'.
But they're still both anti-White.
White Americans are being offered the choice of Anti-White Jewish Supremacist Trump and Anti-White Jewish Supremacist Darkie Barbie.
We already have one-party rule: The Anti-White Anti-Worker Party.
Whites score high in conscientiousness relative to other races, they call it the protestant work ethic. And the math shows that Jews are massively over represented relative to their IQ. An accurate view of race science doesn’t really support anti White ideology in any way really.
If it is the case that under a meritocratic system Jews will end up being disproportionately represented in positions of power, do you think anything could be done to advocate pro-White values while still accepting that outcome? If we returned to a state in America or Europe where they were explicitly treated as White homelands, could there be laws holding Jewish politicians (or politicians of any minority ethnicity) accountable if it could be proven that they were acting in the interests of say Israel instead of the country they were governing?
'Meritocracy' is a false god. It's just another 'universal value' proffered to keep Whites on the liberal plantation so that non-Whites can exploit us.
I don't want to live in a society based around race and luckily you are in the minority because most Whites do believe in treating people as individuals and not favoring their own race. If you want to have a White ethnostate I think it should be formed out of one of the states in the Northern US which are almost entirely White already. I will say I agree that Whites are being exploited and should have the option to live apart if they want to, however I don't think acting the same as other races is a good solution.
The pre-1964 demographic balance should be re-established.
If one leaves aside economic reasoning (rebuild countries destroyed by WW2, perform humble jobs natives don't want to do anymore, pay the pensions, etc) as a mere excuse for having kickstarted immigration, then he will have to assume 3rd world minorities were mass-imported in the West for either of 2 political motives:
1. conspiracy of Jews to dilute European majorities so that Jews feel safe in the societies they recently came to dominate;
2. cold War propaganda by US to show the third world they are more humane than European colonial powers which preceded them, so that third world countries don't get swayed by USSR communist "brotherhood of people" propaganda
Either way you want to look at things, an injustice towards Europeans was perpetrated, so on a moral ground repatriation is justified
Individualism isn’t really a thing. The fact that anyone believes it in speaks for itself, but then again, people believe in “transness” too, or for that matter - a small percentage, but some nonetheless - that chocolate milk comes from chocolate cows.
Sure it is, most people are collective minded but it is possible not to be. Albeit if you are mixed race you are less likely to have a strong connection to a particular group.
I'm not saying that most people are collective minded, I'm saying that individualism isn't a thing. Same stands with "collectivism." These are fake, ideological identities - in as much as transness, sexuality, gender, etc are - which emerged as a means to manipulate reality, rather than represent human existence accurately.
But in a society of universal suffrage and majority rules once white women are in favour of mass immigration and miscegenation then you're own side has er spiked your guns so to speak
But in a society of universal suffrage and majority rules once white women are in favour of mass immigration and miscegenation then you're own side has er spiked your guns so to speak
destroy Jewish self-identity. One should be Jewish-American and not a Jew, wherein being Jewish-American should be intended to be as bland as being, say, Irish-American. That is, feel first and foremost White; the Irish- part is just cosmetic, for exoticism
I agree with that, but then WNs have to stop repeating "Jews aren't White" ad infinitum, and going on about the Khazarian stuff and so forth since it will just have the opposite effect.
A very good take. Vance is by far the best, most viable, of the field from a dissident Right perspective. Vance's candidacy suggests that the elite is looking for a way to shift policy towards domestic and global pragmatism...Globalisation Lite. Vance's sincerity or reliability is less important than his willingness to distance himself from the maximally destructive policies in place at the moment.
Vance embodies the direction of the white leadership class in politics. He is the father of children eligible for affirmative action caste privileges. This guarantees his loyalty to the regime as well as hostility to any attempt to counter the deprioritisation of whites by the system. He cannot advocate for white interests, but will function as a mediating figure interested in ensuring that white accommodate themselves to a managed decline. The neo-Victorian rhetoric about mentoring and self-improvement are dodges to avoid addressing class rivalry and the dysfunction of education resulting from desegregation.
No one pushed by the System can ever be viable to the diss right
If the best that can be proposed is Bowman and not even a Steve Bannon, then I think we have actually gone backwards with respect to where we were in 2016
By definition our quarel is with the system and everyone within it, most certainly including the respectable right.
Vance cannot faithfully represent those deprioritised by affirmative action while fathering and raising children who have a legally enforceable racial privilege at the expense of whites.
Because of this Vance is a critical figure in creating a synthetic version of civic nationalism that exploits grassroots American nationalism while strengthening the emerging caste system.
Good article. Overall, Vance despite his flaws and his choice in marriage is probably the best pick Trump could've made and a 2028 Vance/Gabbard or Gabbard/Vance ticket would be pretty interesting, not gonna lie. Maybe if Trump wins he can give Tulsi a Cabinet position like Secretary of State, play to her strength in Foreign Policy non-interventionist beliefs. Plus, it would be hilarious to see the Hawks, Clintons, and Neocons cry over her appointment.
Just how many Indians will we have to import before our own Indians will look like the UK's Indians? Not that this would be the end of the world by any means, of course.
The verdict is out on Vance as far as I’m concerned but don’t trust his alleged populism as he’s essentially Peter Thiel’s mouthpiece. While not perfect and despite questionable ties with Silicon Valley plutocrats, he’s a better choice than the usual GOP shill. He could be more populist on immigration (we don’t need ‘low skilled’ Venezuelans nor more ‘high-skilled Chinese and Indians and more non-interventionist (including The Middle East and East Asia), so we’ll see what transpires should Trump/Vance be elected.
Thanks for making sense of the current right wing factions. It is promising that Silicon Valley money will have more influence over the right than the Koch Brother's Cato, especially how much they advocate for complete open borders.
Your vision of a post-Trump tech-oriented GOP seems possible. Most the dissident right accounts on Twitter seem to be Silicon Valley types. I feel like a Silicon Valley/San Francisco GOP identity is emerging. I read somewhere the last time a Republican campaigned in California was George HW Bush, and it was in the Bay Area. Would love to see a Bay Area - Orange County GOP alliance considering there is a strong existing Southern California Republican identity already in California with likeable politicians like Young Kim and Michelle Steel.
Good reminder, and a bit discouraging, that Republicans don't have many promising politicians post-Trump. Completely agree with your perception of Hawley, much prefer Trumpism than Evangelicals 2.0, trad-Caths.
What the hell is "HBD"? I've seen it used a lot in the past few months, and not a single MF cared to spell it out in full first. Google and DuckDuckGo are of no help whatsoever. I can't figure it out from context either. Hiring Based on Diversity? Happy Birth Day? Half-Boiled Dumplings?
This is how you do it:
"They are a proponents of DEI (Diversity Equity Inclusion)."
It's just this particular one that happens to only exist as an abbreviation in online discourse. The powers that be, unsurprisingly offered no explanation, let alone an objective one.
As a anti-White, Vance and Chua are *happy* to support 'HBD' because HBD glorifies jews and asians while maintaining the 'Whites are lazy' narrative that serves the interests of the capitalist ruling class.
In the long run, there is no effective separation of race issues from class issues. It's really a question of *which* race you are going to support and *which* class you are doing to defend.
Thiel is an anti-White capitalist. So is Vance. So is Trump.
In the end, they all side with non-Whites (Indians, Chinese) against Whites *because this is the value system of the ruling class in the West*.
They all agree that the White working class in the middle parts of the country need to be stomped into submission and encouraged to kill themselves in deaths of despair.
The 'liberals' just do anti-White different from the 'conservatives'.
But they're still both anti-White.
White Americans are being offered the choice of Anti-White Jewish Supremacist Trump and Anti-White Jewish Supremacist Darkie Barbie.
We already have one-party rule: The Anti-White Anti-Worker Party.
Whites score high in conscientiousness relative to other races, they call it the protestant work ethic. And the math shows that Jews are massively over represented relative to their IQ. An accurate view of race science doesn’t really support anti White ideology in any way really.
If it is the case that under a meritocratic system Jews will end up being disproportionately represented in positions of power, do you think anything could be done to advocate pro-White values while still accepting that outcome? If we returned to a state in America or Europe where they were explicitly treated as White homelands, could there be laws holding Jewish politicians (or politicians of any minority ethnicity) accountable if it could be proven that they were acting in the interests of say Israel instead of the country they were governing?
'Meritocracy' is a false god. It's just another 'universal value' proffered to keep Whites on the liberal plantation so that non-Whites can exploit us.
I don't want to live in a society based around race and luckily you are in the minority because most Whites do believe in treating people as individuals and not favoring their own race. If you want to have a White ethnostate I think it should be formed out of one of the states in the Northern US which are almost entirely White already. I will say I agree that Whites are being exploited and should have the option to live apart if they want to, however I don't think acting the same as other races is a good solution.
The pre-1964 demographic balance should be re-established.
If one leaves aside economic reasoning (rebuild countries destroyed by WW2, perform humble jobs natives don't want to do anymore, pay the pensions, etc) as a mere excuse for having kickstarted immigration, then he will have to assume 3rd world minorities were mass-imported in the West for either of 2 political motives:
1. conspiracy of Jews to dilute European majorities so that Jews feel safe in the societies they recently came to dominate;
2. cold War propaganda by US to show the third world they are more humane than European colonial powers which preceded them, so that third world countries don't get swayed by USSR communist "brotherhood of people" propaganda
Either way you want to look at things, an injustice towards Europeans was perpetrated, so on a moral ground repatriation is justified
Individualism isn’t really a thing. The fact that anyone believes it in speaks for itself, but then again, people believe in “transness” too, or for that matter - a small percentage, but some nonetheless - that chocolate milk comes from chocolate cows.
Sure it is, most people are collective minded but it is possible not to be. Albeit if you are mixed race you are less likely to have a strong connection to a particular group.
I'm not saying that most people are collective minded, I'm saying that individualism isn't a thing. Same stands with "collectivism." These are fake, ideological identities - in as much as transness, sexuality, gender, etc are - which emerged as a means to manipulate reality, rather than represent human existence accurately.
But in a society of universal suffrage and majority rules once white women are in favour of mass immigration and miscegenation then you're own side has er spiked your guns so to speak
But in a society of universal suffrage and majority rules once white women are in favour of mass immigration and miscegenation then you're own side has er spiked your guns so to speak
meritocracy is a utopia just like equality, it's the moral justification for superiority.
As the old aristocracy ruled because of divine will, now the current technocracy rules because of meritocracy.
It's just rule by the experts(=priests of modernity, basically).
I fully agree with Socialists on this point
Ok, so what can we do about that while still maintaining western individualism?
destroy Jewish self-identity. One should be Jewish-American and not a Jew, wherein being Jewish-American should be intended to be as bland as being, say, Irish-American. That is, feel first and foremost White; the Irish- part is just cosmetic, for exoticism
I agree with that, but then WNs have to stop repeating "Jews aren't White" ad infinitum, and going on about the Khazarian stuff and so forth since it will just have the opposite effect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzGnX-MbYE4
HBD does not glorify Jews and Asians, nor does it ever suggest Whites are lazy. Stop being a communist
A very good take. Vance is by far the best, most viable, of the field from a dissident Right perspective. Vance's candidacy suggests that the elite is looking for a way to shift policy towards domestic and global pragmatism...Globalisation Lite. Vance's sincerity or reliability is less important than his willingness to distance himself from the maximally destructive policies in place at the moment.
Vance embodies the direction of the white leadership class in politics. He is the father of children eligible for affirmative action caste privileges. This guarantees his loyalty to the regime as well as hostility to any attempt to counter the deprioritisation of whites by the system. He cannot advocate for white interests, but will function as a mediating figure interested in ensuring that white accommodate themselves to a managed decline. The neo-Victorian rhetoric about mentoring and self-improvement are dodges to avoid addressing class rivalry and the dysfunction of education resulting from desegregation.
No one pushed by the System can ever be viable to the diss right
If the best that can be proposed is Bowman and not even a Steve Bannon, then I think we have actually gone backwards with respect to where we were in 2016
By definition our quarel is with the system and everyone within it, most certainly including the respectable right.
Vance cannot faithfully represent those deprioritised by affirmative action while fathering and raising children who have a legally enforceable racial privilege at the expense of whites.
Because of this Vance is a critical figure in creating a synthetic version of civic nationalism that exploits grassroots American nationalism while strengthening the emerging caste system.
Bowman
he wrote a very irritating book to read
comes across as a toadie and a phony
he is both a glowie and a Jews' sock-puppet, and also a tool of Silicon Valley weirdo elites as you report
and as Anglin likes to remark, he is a practising Christian with a practising Hindu wife
this latter fact excludes any "dissident vibe" ---> see "phony" above
it's like I sense a backstabbing blade running down my spine just by looking at his portrait
don't like him at all
Good article. Overall, Vance despite his flaws and his choice in marriage is probably the best pick Trump could've made and a 2028 Vance/Gabbard or Gabbard/Vance ticket would be pretty interesting, not gonna lie. Maybe if Trump wins he can give Tulsi a Cabinet position like Secretary of State, play to her strength in Foreign Policy non-interventionist beliefs. Plus, it would be hilarious to see the Hawks, Clintons, and Neocons cry over her appointment.
congratulations for making it to unz.com featured article of the day
Whitney Webb has an excellent analysis of Vance as Peter Thiel's bought-and-paid-for stooge.
https://youtu.be/BEw35cWXSgo?si=nwLqMbC63wz1_PdX
LOL he is really dumping hard on him https://www.unz.com/aanglin/its-better-to-insert-ones-penis-into-a-sofa-than-an-indian-pagan-vagina/
Just how many Indians will we have to import before our own Indians will look like the UK's Indians? Not that this would be the end of the world by any means, of course.
The verdict is out on Vance as far as I’m concerned but don’t trust his alleged populism as he’s essentially Peter Thiel’s mouthpiece. While not perfect and despite questionable ties with Silicon Valley plutocrats, he’s a better choice than the usual GOP shill. He could be more populist on immigration (we don’t need ‘low skilled’ Venezuelans nor more ‘high-skilled Chinese and Indians and more non-interventionist (including The Middle East and East Asia), so we’ll see what transpires should Trump/Vance be elected.
Thanks for making sense of the current right wing factions. It is promising that Silicon Valley money will have more influence over the right than the Koch Brother's Cato, especially how much they advocate for complete open borders.
Your vision of a post-Trump tech-oriented GOP seems possible. Most the dissident right accounts on Twitter seem to be Silicon Valley types. I feel like a Silicon Valley/San Francisco GOP identity is emerging. I read somewhere the last time a Republican campaigned in California was George HW Bush, and it was in the Bay Area. Would love to see a Bay Area - Orange County GOP alliance considering there is a strong existing Southern California Republican identity already in California with likeable politicians like Young Kim and Michelle Steel.
Good reminder, and a bit discouraging, that Republicans don't have many promising politicians post-Trump. Completely agree with your perception of Hawley, much prefer Trumpism than Evangelicals 2.0, trad-Caths.
What the hell is "HBD"? I've seen it used a lot in the past few months, and not a single MF cared to spell it out in full first. Google and DuckDuckGo are of no help whatsoever. I can't figure it out from context either. Hiring Based on Diversity? Happy Birth Day? Half-Boiled Dumplings?
This is how you do it:
"They are a proponents of DEI (Diversity Equity Inclusion)."
Or this:
"Let's discuss Diveristy Equity Inclusion (DEI)."
Human BioDiversity. The ethnic spectrum calibrated by the genome.
If it helps, I am flumoxed by a lot of the online jargon too. Must be showing my age.
It's just this particular one that happens to only exist as an abbreviation in online discourse. The powers that be, unsurprisingly offered no explanation, let alone an objective one.
Thanks.