Wait, there's another proposition to funnel billions to the Homeless Industrial Complex!?!
(And I just threw my absentee ballot in the trash!)
Did no one learn anything from Prop HHH of 2016, which was supposed to house the Unhoused but barely a few units have ever been built and each unit ended up costing around $700k??
Does anyone notice in this state that the more billions we spend on the Unhoused the more of them we get? That Cali basically subsidizes the Unhoused to come here, live here and funnels endless billions to political allies who live fat off their "compassion"??
Cali really is a golden goose or more like a rich kid with a no-limit credit card—there is never any accountability (and very little reality) because there's always more money to spend, especially to cover up the problems caused by the last blind splurge.
I watched some of the first debate. You are spot on with Porter and Garvey. I found it interesting that the 3 on the left are standing up there defending (and proposing even more) big gubmint (and I'm talking huge) and they can't see for themselves (or don't care) all the failures at the state and fed level. As if 100 years of this garbage isn't enough evidence of well-meaning and feel-good laws and legislation turning into absolute failures, and it's everywhere, and these 3 morons want more of it..... go figure.
Wait, there's another proposition to funnel billions to the Homeless Industrial Complex!?!
(And I just threw my absentee ballot in the trash!)
Did no one learn anything from Prop HHH of 2016, which was supposed to house the Unhoused but barely a few units have ever been built and each unit ended up costing around $700k??
Does anyone notice in this state that the more billions we spend on the Unhoused the more of them we get? That Cali basically subsidizes the Unhoused to come here, live here and funnels endless billions to political allies who live fat off their "compassion"??
Cali really is a golden goose or more like a rich kid with a no-limit credit card—there is never any accountability (and very little reality) because there's always more money to spend, especially to cover up the problems caused by the last blind splurge.
I watched some of the first debate. You are spot on with Porter and Garvey. I found it interesting that the 3 on the left are standing up there defending (and proposing even more) big gubmint (and I'm talking huge) and they can't see for themselves (or don't care) all the failures at the state and fed level. As if 100 years of this garbage isn't enough evidence of well-meaning and feel-good laws and legislation turning into absolute failures, and it's everywhere, and these 3 morons want more of it..... go figure.