Trump intuits the shift in opinion amongst the grassroots. He is responsive to this, which is entirely good. Trump's weaknesses and limitations are vastly less important than the fact that his rhetoric is transformative. There is no going back to civic nationalism though regime loyalists on the right will try. Neither Trump (a 90s style centrist Democrat at heart) nor Tucker Carlson (a nostalgic country club conservative) constitute the future. They are transitional figures only and almost as futile as the heroes of the regime itself. Future white leaders will emerge to take advantage of the opportunities now opening up. In the meantime we will see the regime panic over the imagined extremism now on offer.
The hyperracialisation of America was guaranteed in 2008. As a legal 'scholar' Obama specialised in critical race theory, the legacy of Derrick Bell. As president Obama made critical race theory integral to the operations of the regime.
Rightwing multiculturalism will not be defined by debate amongst the online right but by the dynamics of real-world enmity and rivalry. This won't involve anything apocalyptic but low intensity communal hostilities with intermittent violence is likely.
The enclave option is mostly theoretical. At best it is an aspiration, a useful ploy for the regime to use as it attempts to manage the expectations of those trapped within the continental USA. Neither the current nor any future regime is ever going to tolerate freedom of association by whites on any significant scale. The most privileged whites will be allowed a degree of physical safety in return for their compliance but most whites do not have this option.
Life seems to work a lot better when everyone simply focuses on their own success and happiness. Forget race, sexually, gender, religion, etc. and just make life work.
I was told I was a loser and failure because I came from the wrong side of the tracks. I grew up pretty poor.
But I did all those old fashion "white things" like work hard, study hard and never quit. I've been up and down the ladder like a yo-yo.
Now I live in top of a mountain that I own. I'm away from everything and it all by choice. Because I know what's it's like to have and not have, I'm an extreme prepper.
My success is available to anyone. I'm reasonably intelligent but not a genius. The key is indefatigable persistence.
"Gut" here refers to your innate instinct. He is implying that that is hereditary, comes from your genetic makeup. It's not learned, nor is it randomly assigned at birth
I'm not going to 'support' it because I know that no amount of 'evidence' will get you to change your mind. It's either the case or its not. Our 'knowing' about it is a nice-to-have but not essential to whether it's the case or not. I think it's the case. You don't. Hopefully, more people side with me and not you. We'll just have to see.
Every bottom feeder from around the world is being encouraged to illegally invade America. They're criminals, rapists, terrorists, gangbangers and fat pregnant woman draped with children. That's what's coming into America.
It's called "white replacement," because that's how it works in the real world. In a hypothetical world in which an influx of white illegal immigrants could produce votes for the Democrats, they'd support that too. (But imagine conservative Canadians pouring across the border as refugees from the Trudeau regime. Think libs would be OK with that?) The fact that in the real world they expect to get votes from brown illegal immigrants (possibly without even granting them amnesty/citizenship) is the only reason they favor unrestrained immigration of non-white people. You can bet your bottom dollar that if they thought all those brown people would vote for conservatives, they'd have zero interest in allowing them into the country. They aren't particularly friendly to brown people, they just play like they are in the cynical belief that it will put them, and keep them, in power. That they can also paint conservatives as "racists" for being against the invasion is just icing on the cake, but they'd be happy to not have the icing if their favored invaders were white.
10 years too late. Literal friend/enemy distinction in the streets with racialized killing of whites by browns, abetted (and funded) by the US government, and worldwide in France, Ireland, Holland etc. Even in Nigeria with a local take on it, black Christians killed by black Muslims.
We are past niceties. When the rhetoric becomes literally violent, the violence in reposnse (none significant at this time) will have to serve as rhetoric going forward.
Please do, 'bow out'. Your approach to dealing with your anti-White attitudes is simply to accuse me of doing some thing completely normal. You call my defense of my position as 'comfort-mantras' as if your embrace of despair and misogyny against White women isn't somehow comforting to you at some level.
It's not that I don't belief that I'm justified in my position, it's simply that I recognize that I cannot justify it to *you* because you're anti-White and I'm pro-White.
Apparently there is no better choice for President than Trump. Democraps can't seem to find a competent candidate. They seem to think it's more important to stop Trump than find their own candidate. Build that wall ! Trump24 ❤️🇺🇸🙏
We’d be worse off as our economy wouldn’t have benefited from a few years of ag productivity at the same level.
What is overlooked is that the only reason blacks are in the first world is slavery. They’ve benefitted hugely from slavery but want others to feel guilty about it..
This was a very thoughtful and though-provoking analysis. Robert's point about 'symmetrical multiculturalism' provides a way to understand the ethos that might be promoted. Still, what concerns me is that the foundation for dialog between the upper-class urban White multiculturalists and the middle-and-working class suburban and rural 'concerned Whites' doesn't seem to exist and, in fact, most politics is designed to exacerbate friction between these two White groups in the name of 'politics'.
Most upper-class Whites already lead a 90% White Nationalist lifestyle. The working class has already been living mixed-race precarity for some time. It's the 'middle class' being driven into the working class who are experiencing both class and race anxiety. So the question then becomes, 'How do we get one class of Whites to sympathize with the rest of the White race in North America?'
I would like to suggest that this is more akin to a spiritual question than a political one.
But it's a spiritual problem with great political implications.
As you yourself wrote in one of your previous articles, your "symmetric (white-inclusive) multiculturalism" is at odds with "the American framework" and "most Americans can't comprehend it." That is because America is largely defined by its white majority (or at the very least its historic white majority), and there remains a clear distinction between America's rightful white core and diversity. That's what Scott Greer argues on his Substack blog. Scott Greer's views are the opposite of yours. He says that white identity politics literally equals American nationalism, because America is inherently white, and MAGA is the correct tool to secure and rejuvenate the American nation i.e. its rightful white core.
It's not clear which one of you is right -- it can go either way, but as of right now, Scott Greer's view is considered "conventional" in the US and yours is "unconventional," once again because of the "American framework" that you alluded to. Like if someone waves the American flag, which represents the concept of the US, that person likely comes from America's white core, and represents historic-majority interests. Your views may be influenced by California which differs somewhat from the current US mainstream. You've written that in CA there's no hostility between the races, but in the rest of the country, if you turn on FOX News, there's definite hostility. They try to mask it somewhat with a small "fig leaf" of political party as opposed to race, but it's definitely a proxy for race and white identity politics, as anyone can see right away.
We're in the midst of emerging white identity politics, but it's not clear whether symmetric or asymmetric. Even if seemingly symmetric, like an American Orania, there could still be racial conflict and strife, which is what happened in South Africa.
Trump intuits the shift in opinion amongst the grassroots. He is responsive to this, which is entirely good. Trump's weaknesses and limitations are vastly less important than the fact that his rhetoric is transformative. There is no going back to civic nationalism though regime loyalists on the right will try. Neither Trump (a 90s style centrist Democrat at heart) nor Tucker Carlson (a nostalgic country club conservative) constitute the future. They are transitional figures only and almost as futile as the heroes of the regime itself. Future white leaders will emerge to take advantage of the opportunities now opening up. In the meantime we will see the regime panic over the imagined extremism now on offer.
The hyperracialisation of America was guaranteed in 2008. As a legal 'scholar' Obama specialised in critical race theory, the legacy of Derrick Bell. As president Obama made critical race theory integral to the operations of the regime.
Rightwing multiculturalism will not be defined by debate amongst the online right but by the dynamics of real-world enmity and rivalry. This won't involve anything apocalyptic but low intensity communal hostilities with intermittent violence is likely.
The enclave option is mostly theoretical. At best it is an aspiration, a useful ploy for the regime to use as it attempts to manage the expectations of those trapped within the continental USA. Neither the current nor any future regime is ever going to tolerate freedom of association by whites on any significant scale. The most privileged whites will be allowed a degree of physical safety in return for their compliance but most whites do not have this option.
Life seems to work a lot better when everyone simply focuses on their own success and happiness. Forget race, sexually, gender, religion, etc. and just make life work.
I was told I was a loser and failure because I came from the wrong side of the tracks. I grew up pretty poor.
But I did all those old fashion "white things" like work hard, study hard and never quit. I've been up and down the ladder like a yo-yo.
Now I live in top of a mountain that I own. I'm away from everything and it all by choice. Because I know what's it's like to have and not have, I'm an extreme prepper.
My success is available to anyone. I'm reasonably intelligent but not a genius. The key is indefatigable persistence.
That comes from your gut. Not your race.
Your gut comes from your race.
And you support that assertion how?
"Gut" here refers to your innate instinct. He is implying that that is hereditary, comes from your genetic makeup. It's not learned, nor is it randomly assigned at birth
I'm not going to 'support' it because I know that no amount of 'evidence' will get you to change your mind. It's either the case or its not. Our 'knowing' about it is a nice-to-have but not essential to whether it's the case or not. I think it's the case. You don't. Hopefully, more people side with me and not you. We'll just have to see.
People fail to grasp that what the establishment is doing is practicing ethnic cleansing of whites.
Every bottom feeder from around the world is being encouraged to illegally invade America. They're criminals, rapists, terrorists, gangbangers and fat pregnant woman draped with children. That's what's coming into America.
It's called "white replacement," because that's how it works in the real world. In a hypothetical world in which an influx of white illegal immigrants could produce votes for the Democrats, they'd support that too. (But imagine conservative Canadians pouring across the border as refugees from the Trudeau regime. Think libs would be OK with that?) The fact that in the real world they expect to get votes from brown illegal immigrants (possibly without even granting them amnesty/citizenship) is the only reason they favor unrestrained immigration of non-white people. You can bet your bottom dollar that if they thought all those brown people would vote for conservatives, they'd have zero interest in allowing them into the country. They aren't particularly friendly to brown people, they just play like they are in the cynical belief that it will put them, and keep them, in power. That they can also paint conservatives as "racists" for being against the invasion is just icing on the cake, but they'd be happy to not have the icing if their favored invaders were white.
10 years too late. Literal friend/enemy distinction in the streets with racialized killing of whites by browns, abetted (and funded) by the US government, and worldwide in France, Ireland, Holland etc. Even in Nigeria with a local take on it, black Christians killed by black Muslims.
We are past niceties. When the rhetoric becomes literally violent, the violence in reposnse (none significant at this time) will have to serve as rhetoric going forward.
Please do, 'bow out'. Your approach to dealing with your anti-White attitudes is simply to accuse me of doing some thing completely normal. You call my defense of my position as 'comfort-mantras' as if your embrace of despair and misogyny against White women isn't somehow comforting to you at some level.
It's not that I don't belief that I'm justified in my position, it's simply that I recognize that I cannot justify it to *you* because you're anti-White and I'm pro-White.
What a waste of time and energy 😞
Apparently there is no better choice for President than Trump. Democraps can't seem to find a competent candidate. They seem to think it's more important to stop Trump than find their own candidate. Build that wall ! Trump24 ❤️🇺🇸🙏
How did the Communists took over Russian Empire and China? Numbers doesn’t mean shit. Dominance do.
We need a white baby boom now
Lazy.
Two questions
Would America be better or worse if there never was slavery?
Would the African be better if there never was slavery?
We’d be worse off as our economy wouldn’t have benefited from a few years of ag productivity at the same level.
What is overlooked is that the only reason blacks are in the first world is slavery. They’ve benefitted hugely from slavery but want others to feel guilty about it..
"Not to be hyperbolic"? Well, apparently you are. Nothing but a bunch of word salad is all I'm seeing here. Each w their own agenda.
This was a very thoughtful and though-provoking analysis. Robert's point about 'symmetrical multiculturalism' provides a way to understand the ethos that might be promoted. Still, what concerns me is that the foundation for dialog between the upper-class urban White multiculturalists and the middle-and-working class suburban and rural 'concerned Whites' doesn't seem to exist and, in fact, most politics is designed to exacerbate friction between these two White groups in the name of 'politics'.
Most upper-class Whites already lead a 90% White Nationalist lifestyle. The working class has already been living mixed-race precarity for some time. It's the 'middle class' being driven into the working class who are experiencing both class and race anxiety. So the question then becomes, 'How do we get one class of Whites to sympathize with the rest of the White race in North America?'
I would like to suggest that this is more akin to a spiritual question than a political one.
But it's a spiritual problem with great political implications.
As you yourself wrote in one of your previous articles, your "symmetric (white-inclusive) multiculturalism" is at odds with "the American framework" and "most Americans can't comprehend it." That is because America is largely defined by its white majority (or at the very least its historic white majority), and there remains a clear distinction between America's rightful white core and diversity. That's what Scott Greer argues on his Substack blog. Scott Greer's views are the opposite of yours. He says that white identity politics literally equals American nationalism, because America is inherently white, and MAGA is the correct tool to secure and rejuvenate the American nation i.e. its rightful white core.
It's not clear which one of you is right -- it can go either way, but as of right now, Scott Greer's view is considered "conventional" in the US and yours is "unconventional," once again because of the "American framework" that you alluded to. Like if someone waves the American flag, which represents the concept of the US, that person likely comes from America's white core, and represents historic-majority interests. Your views may be influenced by California which differs somewhat from the current US mainstream. You've written that in CA there's no hostility between the races, but in the rest of the country, if you turn on FOX News, there's definite hostility. They try to mask it somewhat with a small "fig leaf" of political party as opposed to race, but it's definitely a proxy for race and white identity politics, as anyone can see right away.
We're in the midst of emerging white identity politics, but it's not clear whether symmetric or asymmetric. Even if seemingly symmetric, like an American Orania, there could still be racial conflict and strife, which is what happened in South Africa.