This article seems to be a based-centrist's attempt to concern troll the most flagrant current example of ongoing white genocide - South Africa. The article elides (or the author simply does not know) a few key pieces of information. In SA, penniless black farm murder gangs use 10,000-dollar cellular radio jammers to coordinatedly block communications before murdering all the men and raping all women at a given farm. Somewhat surprisingly we've all observed instances where the gangs don't even steal much beyond what is easy to take, suggesting the violence is the main reward. The issue here is that many aspects of the violence seem to suggest outside funding (who is buying the cell jammers?), outside coordination, and the typical News Media ethnic coverup.
In 2024, genocide doesn't have to be "everyone forced onto traincars all at once." Denying people a chance to work to earn their daily bread for themselves or their family could be genocide---and even better, it wouldn't draw the ire of the UN, doubly so if the victims are caucasians. Imagine committing a genocide without the bad optics of ditch-thrown bodies being photographed--or even a single mainstream media reporter daring to report on it! We don't need to wonder what a plausibly deniable genocide would look like.
You wrote "The next stage for genocide is preparation." There's nothing to prepare for. South African blacks don't have to do much to legally expropriate the existing affluent whites and casually put the rest of the whites who don't flee in shallow graves over the course of several decades, perhaps everywhere but the cape, or perhaps even including the cape. Time is on the blacks' side--not on the that of the white South Africans. When the ports are broken and the last power transmission station goes down - how are the remaining whites supposed to continue making their lives, precisely? Backyard microfarms surrounded by the omnipresent 10-foot security fencing?
One bright spot: this article does highlight the evil of "accelerationism." Accelerating into a brick wall only produces WORSE violent damage to those involved, not a shorter path back to civilization. But what's truly missing in this article and 98% of others is a sense for the fragility of civilization. California shows us that the appearance of order can be much, much more durable than a civilization worth living in. South Africa shows us that non-systemic genocide can be much, much more deniable than people would like to admit.
It is crystal clear. You got lost focusing on how you define one word ( which you got wrong, as that word has a specific definition ) and missed the whole articles point. Go back and read it again.
"South Africa’s problems stem from trying to create a Western style nation-state that is also urbanized and a liberal democracy, out of many African tribes."
I liked what you wrote until I read this. You aren't a race realist, are you? There is no political fix and to think so is delusional.
While a majority Bantu South Africa is unlikely to ever resemble Japan or Switzerland, it isn't a holy commandment that it remains a dysfunctional criminal haven forever. Had we looked at Rwanda 30 years ago and been asked to predict what it would look like in 2025, I bet we would both had been wrong. Botswana, too, very functional (albeit way more homogenous than the RSA.)
I wouldn't want to live anywhere other than where I live now because this is where my life and community and people are. Botswana or even Namibia would be fine with me. Rwanda, I don't like the climate.
I'd do the same job I do now. I realize this isn't a usual case but I'm answering for myself.
USA but not born here and have lived and worked in numerous places.
To be clear the USA is the best place on earth to live, better in almost every respect than anywhere in Africa, and I don't take it for granted to live in the US. I'm just saying SSA doesn't have to be on a downward trajectory forever and some of it is actually decent.
One thing I noticed recently was that SA's urban blacks are now sub-TFR. Only the ruralites are having kids. SA is pretty urban by sub-Saharan standards, but there are still millions of Xhosa and Zulu villagers. They shall inherit the earth if the urban ANC really does crumble. That would make your prediction of a decentralized state more likely.
What does collapse mean? You imply it means a return to the stone age. The western Roman Empire did not collapse in that sense. Nowhere does, except briefly. Warlords emerge to restore order where anarchy has arrived etc. Adam Smith was correct that there is a great deal of ruin in a nation, and we are seeing just how that ruin runs in SA.
As a white born and bred South African but now also an American citizen. I spent six weeks in SA about one year ago and was again impressed by how well the predominant white areas are run and how nice it is. It is truly a first world situation with world class restaurants and malls. Your bang for buck is out of this world. I felt completely safe but I'm not naïve or stupid. Do not venture out in the predominant black areas, even as a black person. Its a different world where only the strong survive.
it is true, though that accelerationism is a fatal hope. Redpilling may or may not occur and people long continue to feast on their resentments, enjoying the spectacle of those they hate being damaged. That sustains their vicious stupidity at length.
This article seems to be a based-centrist's attempt to concern troll the most flagrant current example of ongoing white genocide - South Africa. The article elides (or the author simply does not know) a few key pieces of information. In SA, penniless black farm murder gangs use 10,000-dollar cellular radio jammers to coordinatedly block communications before murdering all the men and raping all women at a given farm. Somewhat surprisingly we've all observed instances where the gangs don't even steal much beyond what is easy to take, suggesting the violence is the main reward. The issue here is that many aspects of the violence seem to suggest outside funding (who is buying the cell jammers?), outside coordination, and the typical News Media ethnic coverup.
In 2024, genocide doesn't have to be "everyone forced onto traincars all at once." Denying people a chance to work to earn their daily bread for themselves or their family could be genocide---and even better, it wouldn't draw the ire of the UN, doubly so if the victims are caucasians. Imagine committing a genocide without the bad optics of ditch-thrown bodies being photographed--or even a single mainstream media reporter daring to report on it! We don't need to wonder what a plausibly deniable genocide would look like.
You wrote "The next stage for genocide is preparation." There's nothing to prepare for. South African blacks don't have to do much to legally expropriate the existing affluent whites and casually put the rest of the whites who don't flee in shallow graves over the course of several decades, perhaps everywhere but the cape, or perhaps even including the cape. Time is on the blacks' side--not on the that of the white South Africans. When the ports are broken and the last power transmission station goes down - how are the remaining whites supposed to continue making their lives, precisely? Backyard microfarms surrounded by the omnipresent 10-foot security fencing?
One bright spot: this article does highlight the evil of "accelerationism." Accelerating into a brick wall only produces WORSE violent damage to those involved, not a shorter path back to civilization. But what's truly missing in this article and 98% of others is a sense for the fragility of civilization. California shows us that the appearance of order can be much, much more durable than a civilization worth living in. South Africa shows us that non-systemic genocide can be much, much more deniable than people would like to admit.
You have missed the point. Getting emotional ruins your ability to think rationally
Perhaps -
if you think I missed the point - by all means share what you think the point of the article was
It is crystal clear. You got lost focusing on how you define one word ( which you got wrong, as that word has a specific definition ) and missed the whole articles point. Go back and read it again.
"South Africa’s problems stem from trying to create a Western style nation-state that is also urbanized and a liberal democracy, out of many African tribes."
I liked what you wrote until I read this. You aren't a race realist, are you? There is no political fix and to think so is delusional.
While a majority Bantu South Africa is unlikely to ever resemble Japan or Switzerland, it isn't a holy commandment that it remains a dysfunctional criminal haven forever. Had we looked at Rwanda 30 years ago and been asked to predict what it would look like in 2025, I bet we would both had been wrong. Botswana, too, very functional (albeit way more homogenous than the RSA.)
Would you want to live in Rwanda or Botswana as a non-millionaire white person without servants? How would you support a family?
I wouldn't want to live anywhere other than where I live now because this is where my life and community and people are. Botswana or even Namibia would be fine with me. Rwanda, I don't like the climate.
I'd do the same job I do now. I realize this isn't a usual case but I'm answering for myself.
To the extent possible without doxxing yourself, what nation or region do you live in?
USA but not born here and have lived and worked in numerous places.
To be clear the USA is the best place on earth to live, better in almost every respect than anywhere in Africa, and I don't take it for granted to live in the US. I'm just saying SSA doesn't have to be on a downward trajectory forever and some of it is actually decent.
I basically agree.
Grateful for your content here and elsewhere on the web [fistbump]
That’s right. The United States created a thriving developed economy out of various different European tribes. It wasn’t a problem for white people.
Good point.
One thing I noticed recently was that SA's urban blacks are now sub-TFR. Only the ruralites are having kids. SA is pretty urban by sub-Saharan standards, but there are still millions of Xhosa and Zulu villagers. They shall inherit the earth if the urban ANC really does crumble. That would make your prediction of a decentralized state more likely.
What does collapse mean? You imply it means a return to the stone age. The western Roman Empire did not collapse in that sense. Nowhere does, except briefly. Warlords emerge to restore order where anarchy has arrived etc. Adam Smith was correct that there is a great deal of ruin in a nation, and we are seeing just how that ruin runs in SA.
As a white born and bred South African but now also an American citizen. I spent six weeks in SA about one year ago and was again impressed by how well the predominant white areas are run and how nice it is. It is truly a first world situation with world class restaurants and malls. Your bang for buck is out of this world. I felt completely safe but I'm not naïve or stupid. Do not venture out in the predominant black areas, even as a black person. Its a different world where only the strong survive.
it is true, though that accelerationism is a fatal hope. Redpilling may or may not occur and people long continue to feast on their resentments, enjoying the spectacle of those they hate being damaged. That sustains their vicious stupidity at length.