This is a chart of household income, not how much women make or how intelligent they are. Married couples and high-earning men have higher TFRs and higher household income. That does not mean high-earning women have higher TFRs.
I'm actually guessing this is mostly age, & young people being broke.
I bet if you adjusted it for age, they would all be dysgenic.
Like, of course baby boomer & gen X women, who have higher income than z/llennial women, also have had more children in their lives.
For poorer minorities who tend to breed more younger & poorer, the poor & young's fertility is probably still high enough to cancel out this natural effect
This is less the upper class having more kids & more a generational thing & the poor having fewer kids than they used to 20 years ago as antinatalism trickles down to the lower classes.
The poor still have more kids than the wealthy overall.
Seems like making Norplant/Vasalgel/Contraline a precondition for welfare access really could do wonders for making black and Hispanic fertility more eugenic, no?
Eugenic? Only if you assume that lower income whites are biomass or para-biomass. This assumption inevitably suggests a residual degree of class contempt. In the absence of hard evidence one could say that the regime enables privileged whites to flourish while it constrains the others. The benefit to the regime is that privileged whites lack any immediate incentive to provide leadership to disaffected whites and diminishing fertility reduces the number of non-privileged whites who might rebel in the first place.
Speaking of white chix, there are some outside my window playing frisbee in the middle of an empty parking lot. Not even spread out, they’re far closer than I am to my friend when we play catch with a baseball even though frisbees glide through the air. What the fuck? It’s the middle of the night. There is a big turf field right next to where I live. Why are they doing this? Not related to the post I’m just blogposting o algo
I think you may be reversing cause and effect. At the very least the average age at each child would need to be taken into account. There's no reason to think that income came first then fertility.
This is a chart of household income, not how much women make or how intelligent they are. Married couples and high-earning men have higher TFRs and higher household income. That does not mean high-earning women have higher TFRs.
Require sterilization for welfare & tax the childless with above average incomes to pay for it.
I'm actually guessing this is mostly age, & young people being broke.
I bet if you adjusted it for age, they would all be dysgenic.
Like, of course baby boomer & gen X women, who have higher income than z/llennial women, also have had more children in their lives.
For poorer minorities who tend to breed more younger & poorer, the poor & young's fertility is probably still high enough to cancel out this natural effect
This is less the upper class having more kids & more a generational thing & the poor having fewer kids than they used to 20 years ago as antinatalism trickles down to the lower classes.
The poor still have more kids than the wealthy overall.
Tfr only account for women under 45
Still applies. 37-43 yr old women make more income & have also had more children on average than 18-22 yr old women.
Seems like making Norplant/Vasalgel/Contraline a precondition for welfare access really could do wonders for making black and Hispanic fertility more eugenic, no?
Eugenic? Only if you assume that lower income whites are biomass or para-biomass. This assumption inevitably suggests a residual degree of class contempt. In the absence of hard evidence one could say that the regime enables privileged whites to flourish while it constrains the others. The benefit to the regime is that privileged whites lack any immediate incentive to provide leadership to disaffected whites and diminishing fertility reduces the number of non-privileged whites who might rebel in the first place.
Speaking of white chix, there are some outside my window playing frisbee in the middle of an empty parking lot. Not even spread out, they’re far closer than I am to my friend when we play catch with a baseball even though frisbees glide through the air. What the fuck? It’s the middle of the night. There is a big turf field right next to where I live. Why are they doing this? Not related to the post I’m just blogposting o algo
Let’s go white women!
I think you may be reversing cause and effect. At the very least the average age at each child would need to be taken into account. There's no reason to think that income came first then fertility.