Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Torsten Gellrich's avatar

A new religion? It seems to me that you actually want to establish a new branch of science. A science of consciousness. That would make more sense to me. It encompasses all religions.

Every religion has its mystics. And mysticism is nothing more than divine experiences of consciousness. Cataloguing these and searching for commonalities or possible laws seems worthwhile to me.

This would allow you to connect all religions and, in the best case, find a universal truth.

See also:

https://annakaharris.com/

https://www.bernardokastrup.com/

Monk.:'s avatar

I percive that when you tried to describe pantheism you just went on describing neoplatonism and theurgy. Worshiping the transcendent god in matter. Either through prostrations, icons, singing, ect is not pantheism. Neither is seeing the beauty in all things. Pantheism is the rejection of transcendant reality because by definition it is uncreated therefore not existant. They conflate being with existance. Only read up to that point but so far you just seem like a platonist.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?