Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Torsten Gellrich's avatar

A new religion? It seems to me that you actually want to establish a new branch of science. A science of consciousness. That would make more sense to me. It encompasses all religions.

Every religion has its mystics. And mysticism is nothing more than divine experiences of consciousness. Cataloguing these and searching for commonalities or possible laws seems worthwhile to me.

This would allow you to connect all religions and, in the best case, find a universal truth.

See also:

https://annakaharris.com/

https://www.bernardokastrup.com/

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

I'm glad you're joining the Platonic bunch, although I'd advise you to check out both Templism and Praxism before proclaiming a new religion. You might enjoy them as they are doing a similar thing (I don't think Praxism can be considered a "new religion" though. Praxius is technically a Catholic IIRC, but it's about the philosophy)

https://templism.substack.com/

https://praxia.substack.com/

-The soul emanates from consciousness, not the other way around. The "Divine Consciousness" or "total consciousness" is arguably analogous to The One and is completely simple. Particular consciousness is analogous to the Intellect which in most systems either precedes the soul or enters existence only in tandem with it. The exact debate over whether or not consciousness = The One is outlined here:

https://substack.com/@birrin/p-146866362

-Things which extend from something else emanate from it, but it is also worth noting that things which exist as a quality of something else are also emanating from it. Sunlight emanates from the sun but so does, say, the Chromosphere or the Solar Core.

-Gaia/Terra don't exactly represent natural beauty, as early on Gaia was baren. It was the titans and gods that shaped the surface of Gaia, that carved out mountains and oceans. Meanwhile, Gaia gives birth to the Giants and Typhon who actively threaten natural order. In some myths, Gaia serves more as the opposite, as primordial chaos. Prometheus also does not represent manmade beauty, Prometheus is ultimately villainous. He seeks to usurp the position of the gods, that is all, and that is why Zeus punishes him. It is not because he is pro-Humanity and Zeus is anti-Humanity. This is quite clear in Hesiod's reading.

-The Demiurge is identified with the divine intellect and is fundamentally good in Neoplatonism. He is good, because he must be. The Demiurge has a reciprocal relationship with the form of the good, he is the Two Ones, the one as viewed from below.

-The Holy Spirit is actually probably closer to the Pneuma or world-soul than the divine consciousness. The Father is closest to the Monad, the Son is closest to the Intellect, and the HS is closest to the world-soul.

Here are some of my articles on platonic religion which I would recommend. I would be flattered if you checked them out, but do not feel pressured to read any of them:

https://sectionalismnotes.substack.com/p/chaoskampf-as-the-perennial-tradition

https://sectionalismnotes.substack.com/p/the-eagle-and-the-ibex-the-natures

And I would recommend this article for steelmanning up that justification for Platonic morality:

https://substack.com/@birrin/p-148353797

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?