Dark Brandon’s Open Borders Scheme and the Open Borders for Hotties Meme

Source: @GraduatedBen on X

“Open Borders for Hotties” is a dissident right meme, though Sacha Barron Cohen’s, Ali G, had a scene where Ali G in parliament only let in fit female asylum seekers. Cohen is a liberal who was likely parodying misogyny and xenophobia, though perhaps he was hinting that is actually a great idea. On a similar note, former Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi, said immigrants are not welcome but beautiful girls can stay.

If neoliberal elites were serious about quelling nationalist populist sentiment and deradicalizing angry young men, they would favor or encourage the immigration of young single women. This might cause a realignment where young men on the Right become more liberal, moderate, or perhaps libertarian, while women might become more xenophobic. While Open Borders for Hotties is controversial and unrealistic, it is great as a meme and as a way to shift the culture.

Source: @AgueroForTexas on X

A recent video of migrants at the California border stood out from the usual stereotype of migrants from Latin American. Basically many of these migrants, primarily from Colombia and Brazil, were fairly attractive, Caucasian-looking, and also appeared to be from more middle class backgrounds. Regardless, the overwhelming majority of migrants are military age men and people of color.

Source: @empireenjoyer10 on X

In the 2010s, it was primarily indigenous peoples from Central America crossing the border. Prior to that it was mostly Mexicans. With Biden’s migrant crisis, it is basically everyone from all over the World, including Indigenous, Afro, and White Hispanics, Haitians, Africans, Middle Easterners, Russians, and Central, East, and South Asians. The heavily indigenous Southern Mexicans and Gutatalamas, who dominated illegal immigration for a long time, are generally humble, nice, hardworking people, but are just not stereotypically known for having hot women, like Colombia, Venezuela, and Brazil are.

Source: @Oceanave1980 on X

My impression from migrant videos is that Colombians have more semi-White, Castizo types while the Venezuelan proletariat are tri-racial. However, Venezuela’s middle and upper class are more White, who made up earlier waves, but generally don’t show up at the border. I’ve also noticed a handful of White Cubans in migrant videos. In sheer numbers, Brazil has the 2^nd most Whites outside of Europe after the United States, and is currently economically and politically volatile. Besides, Brazil and the Southern Cone, Colombia has the most European ancestry in Latin America.

Source: @henri_nn1 on X

With this new wave of migrants from Venezuela’s underclass, a significant portion seem to have a really strong sense of entitlement, and commit a lot of crime. However, they are just responding to incentives. I could also see Venezuelan migrants recruited by the Left as political pawns. In contrast, past waves of illegals from Southern Mexico and Central America, mostly kept their heads down. Though that is not to say there still weren’t major problems.  

Hot women are traditionally less likely to emigrate, which could also explain why Europeans are on average more attractive than White Americans. Ukraine, Russia, Colombia, and Brazil, which are known for hot women, are seeing a big increase in immigration to the US, which is a White Pill out of a lot of negative demographic news. If WWIII were to break out with open borders, I could see hotter women immigrating, compared to labor based immigration. For instance, from Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Israel, Lebanon, and various Central Asian nations. Speculating global hotness kind of totters between the objective and subjective. Whoever made the Global Hotness Map is obviously not a fan of BIPOC, with a very strong preference for Europeans and Northeast Asians. I didn’t make the map, so no offense intended if you’re from the “horrendous zone.”

Source: unknown data but originally posted to Terrible Maps on X

A comment in response to Steve Sailer’s article on the Global Hotness Index said, “In the fall of 1986 I spent two weeks in South Africa, traveling all across the country, and all (and I mean all) of the women I saw were beautiful, bar none. It wasn’t just my opinion either. Everyone in our group noticed the same thing and we thought RSA’s distance from the rest of the civilized world kept the beauty of the women there a secret.”

The dissident right has called for Western Nations to take in White South Africans for asylum and even Trump has made statements about that. However, there are reports of White South Africans taking advantage of Biden’s open borders, which is ironic. There has also been a lot of White migrants from Russia and Georgia at the border. Not to mention that Biden has been much more generous about welcoming Ukrainian refugees than Trump would have been.

Source: @EndWokeness on X

Under Biden, we are getting a taste of true open borders, which is anarchy. Prior to Biden, including under Trump, it has been more of a managed replacement, dictated by corporate and bureaucratic interests, yet also keeping numbers manageable enough to not outrage the American people. With the previous system, managerial institutions selected for who can come and who can’t come, while now just about anyone can come.

The question is whether there is a tradeoff between open borders, with a segment of hot foreign women and maybe more Whites, as opposed to less numerically, controlled, but labor oriented immigration. Basically dominated by Central American construction workers and H1B tech workers, plus family reunification, which was the case under Trump. Labor based immigration screws heavily male and this would also apply to Trump’s proposal for merit based immigration. Biden's immigration is chaotic and turning America into the Third World, but at least there are some hot women who would not have immigrated under Trump. However, I am probably being way too optimistic, with the negatives of open borders outweighing the positives.  

Trump reduced legal immigration somewhat but not as dramatically as immigration restrictionists hoped for. Under Trump, immigration was also skewed towards immigrant groups which already had a foothold. However, he made it harder for new immigrant diasporas to get a foothold, which has its pros and cons. Trump’s supporters have this image of him as a  womanizer who loves beauty pageants and surrounding himself with beautiful women, thus would be open to something like Open Borders for Hotties. However, Trump’s immigration policies were a balance between border hawks and law and order conservatism with concerns for business interests, with nothing really radically outside the box on immigration.

Source: cosmopolitan.com   

Having an immigration moratorium without raising native birthrates will not recreate a 1950s utopia. More homogenous parts of America might benefit from an immigration moratorium. However, California, especially if it remains NIMBY, would be rapidly ageing with no vitality but also very diverse, as the demographic transformation already happened. Biden’s immigration policies will also create some interesting new enclaves, while returning to the 2010s immigration model is kind of demoralizing, and just boring. Regardless, I am not turning from a nationalist to an open borders advocate, like Richard Hanania or Anatoly Karlin. In all seriousness, I think open borders are a disaster.